YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

Opinion: The “Secondary Effects” Doctrine Still Sucks

Posted On 13 Jun 2018
By : Ben Suroeste

WASHINGTON – I’m not a lawyer – not even of the armchair/internet sort – so I can’t explain why the so-called “secondary effects” doctrine sucks from a legal perspective.

I am, however, a longtime serial customer of business like adult shops and strip clubs which are subject to this buzzkill of a legal standard. As such, I feel firmly qualified to explain why it sucks from a layman’s point of view.

If you read what the egghead who wrote the article linked above says about the secondary effects doctrine, you’ll see stuff like: “The secondary effects doctrine allows government officials to treat patently content-based laws as content-neutral.”

My layman’s interpretation of that is: “This bullshit ‘principle’ lets the government ruin our fun in ways it otherwise wouldn’t be permitted to do.”

“The animating logic is that government officials are not suppressing speech because of its content but because of adverse side effects associated with the speech, such as increased crime or decreased property values,” the egghead’s explanation continues.

This is a fancy way of saying the government can tell strip joints where they can and can’t do business, because it’s somehow the strip joint’s fault that crackheads occasionally break into cars parked near the club.

Anyway, the reason I’m thinking about secondary effects today is just the other day the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a case out of Georgia which involved the doctrine.

In the case, a city in Georgia called Sandy Springs had its zoning ordinances challenged by two strip clubs and an adult bookstore. Without getting too deep into the boring stuff only lawyers like to talk about, basically what happened was when Sandy Springs incorporated in 2005, it established some new ordinances to which those business hadn’t been subject prior to Sandy Spring’s incorporation.

Fast forward to 2016, when a federal judge ruled the city had “reasonably relied on judicial opinions, land use and crime impact reports, and witness observations to meet its burden of supporting its rationale that the ordinances may reduce the costs of secondary effects.”

To me, the key word in that jumble of judicial word-salad is “may.”

If you go back to the article from the egghead from FIRE wrote, it quotes a couple other eggheads in observing the secondary effects doctrine is “susceptible to manipulation.”

“The doctrine has proven to be fertile ground for abuse, empowering government officials to act on their thinly disguised dislike for adult entertainment that otherwise would be entitled to First Amendment protection,” continues Professor Whatshisface. He goes on to note the doctrine “has spread from the regulation of adult businesses to all varieties of speech. For example, it has been used to uphold a student dress code, regulation of signs in historic districts, and restrictions on solicitation.”

In other words, when the government wants to prevent a business from establishing in any given area, or keep a student from wearing a ‘disruptive” t-shirt, or wants to restrict whatever the fuck other disfavored speech it can possibly justify squelching, it reaches for the secondary effects doctrine.

The best part? The government doesn’t even have to prove the business (or person) it seeks to regulate does produce the secondary effects in question, just that it in similar situations elsewhere, some court or another has decided that kind of business or speech could cause those effects – and, evidently, that the government’s ordinances “may” reduce the costs of those effects.

To put that in egghead-ese: “The First Amendment does not require a city, before enacting such an ordinance, to conduct new studies or produce evidence independent of that already generated by other cities, so long as whatever evidence the city relies upon is reasonably believed to be relevant to the problem that the city addresses.”

If that sounds like bullshit to you, that’s because it is bullshit. And so long as this doctrine stands, it’s bullshit adult businesses and their customers are going to be subjected to, again and again, throughout the country.

See? I told you it sucks.

About the Author
Ben Suroeste only reports "hard news" -- which is to say "news" that is "hard" to find anywhere else, mostly because he made it all up. He still doesn't have that fifty bucks he owes you, but he's working on it, OK?
  • google-share
Previous Story

New Reports: Porn’s Role In Cybersecurity Threats Exaggerated

Next Story

Ashley Sinclair is Raising the Production Bar for Niche Fetish Content

Related Posts

Are We CERTAIN ‘Veggie Tales’ Isn’t Harmful to Minors?

Are We CERTAIN ‘Veggie Tales’ Isn’t Harmful to Minors?

Posted On 01 Jul 2025
, By Ben Suroeste
Free Speech Coalition

FSC Decries Supreme Court’s “Radical Departure from Precedent”

Posted On 30 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin
Justices of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Texas Age-Verification Law

Posted On 27 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • Adult Site Broker
    General Business Services
  • XXXtreams
    Adult Content Brokers
  • Israelvipjob
    General Business Services
  • Premiere Listing

    Live Studio

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

XMediaShop Releases Spinner Magazine Issue #3

Posted On 03 Jul 2025

DD White Takes Control in 'The Bachelor Party'

Posted On 03 Jul 2025
Pineapple Support

WannaCollab Joins Pineapple Support As Supporter-Level Sponsor

Posted On 03 Jul 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Sex Toy Collective Dildo Sculptor

Posted On 19 Mar 2019

Find a good sex toy is now a problem,...

Posted On 18 Mar 2024

Thanks to the variety of sex toys, I can...

Posted On 02 Feb 2024

I understand the concerns about...

Posted On 05 Jan 2024

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy