YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Ventura v. Motherless DMCA Dispute

Posted On 30 Oct 2018
By : GeneZorkin

WASHINGTON – As part of its order list issued Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Ventura Content Ltd’s petition to hear Ventura Content, Ltd. V. Motherless, Inc., leaving in place the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision which upheld the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing the case.

In its petition, Ventura argued certiorari was warranted in the case because “the lower courts are in a state of DMCA disarray.”

“At the heart of this disarray exists a new technology business that emerged after 1998, the ‘tube’ site publishing model (akin to YouTube) that the Defendants here operate, one that reproduces and publicly publishes content uploaded by users, including myriad adult content films of Plaintiff-Petitioner Ventura Content,” Ventura wrote in the petition. “The dissent and majority below amply demonstrate the collision on the law, which exists across the nation.”

Ventura asserted that business like Motherless, “which make all their revenue from offering others’ content to viewers, have shoehorned themselves into the DMCA in a manner that has now made online copyright law and offline copyright law exist on two different wavelengths.”

“The result of the DMCA disarray is that abject bootlegging in the offline, brick-and-mortar world remains unlawful, but the same conduct online by an OSP-turned- publisher garners absolute summary judgment immunity,” Ventura added in its petition. “This case demonstrates a brazen business model that makes Grokster’s conduct, brutally condemned by this Court… look decidedly trite.”

While Ventura decried what it termed a “’I Know It When I See It’-type policy” Motherless had in place with respect to terminating repeat infringers among its uploaders, but neither the trial court nor the Ninth Circuit majority took issue with Motherless’ approach to terminating repeat offenders.

“The details of the termination policy are not written down,” Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld wrote in the Ninth Circuit’s decision issued in March. “However, the statute does not say that the policy details must be written, just that the site must inform subscribers of ‘a policy’ of terminating repeat infringers in appropriate circumstances…. So the lack of a detailed written policy is not by itself fatal to safe harbor eligibility. Neither is the fact that Motherless did not publicize its internal criteria.”

The lone dissenting judge in the Ninth Circuit’s hearing of the case, Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson, questioned whether Motherless’ approach to terminating repeat offenders could reasonably be called a “policy.”

“Further supporting the existence of a material issue of fact regarding the establishment of a policy is the failure of (Motherless owner Joshua Lange) to articulate a consistent approach to the termination of repeat infringers,” Rawlinson wrote in his dissent, noting that Lange gave several different and conflicting accounts of how he implements the policy, including at one point describing “an ‘automated system for removing people’ that he later acknowledged did not actually exist.”

“Who can say with a straight face that a ‘gut decision making process’ constitutes a policy?” Rawlinson wrote. “I certainly can’t.”

With the denial of Ventura’s petition, it appears that such “gut decision-making” processes will go unexamined by the Supreme Court – unless SCOTUS should happen to hear a case centered on similar issues in the future.

 

Supreme Court image © David Lat

About the Author
Gene Zorkin has been covering legal and political issues for various adult publications (and under a variety of different pen names) since 2002.
  • google-share
Previous Story

Reliance Jio Blocks Porn in India, Pornhub Sets Up a Mirror

Next Story

Flirt4Free Offers Custom Bonus to Displaced iFriends Models

Related Posts

Justices of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Texas Age-Verification Law

Posted On 27 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin
Free Speech Coalition

FSC Offers Explainer on Kansas Age-Verification Lawsuits

Posted On 30 May 2025
, By GeneZorkin
FSC v. Paxton: Will the Supreme Court Rule in Favor of Texas?

In FSC v. Paxton, Supreme Court Wrestles with Standard of Review, Changes in Tech

Posted On 16 Jan 2025
, By GeneZorkin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • ClickAdu Network
    Mobile Ad Networks
  • Skrill Online Payment System
    Third Party Billing (IPSPs)
  • Webhams
    Clips Stores
  • Premiere Listing

    MojoHost

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

“The Tip” That Left Them Wanting More: CAM4 Creators Speak Out – Live and Unfiltered

Posted On 10 Jul 2025

Ella Rose Stuns In New Scene On Arch Angel Video

Posted On 10 Jul 2025

Adult Star & Businesswoman Lauren Phillips Discusses Her Brand on HRU

Posted On 10 Jul 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Sex Toy Collective Dildo Sculptor

Posted On 19 Mar 2019

Find a good sex toy is now a problem,...

Posted On 18 Mar 2024

Thanks to the variety of sex toys, I can...

Posted On 02 Feb 2024

I understand the concerns about...

Posted On 05 Jan 2024

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy