YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

Court: Porn Studio was ‘Cleverly Disguised Brothel’

Posted On 10 Apr 2017
By : Sue Denim

On Friday, a jury convicted Hartwell, 56, of 10 charges including operating a house of prostitution, pandering and sexual assault.PHOENIX – When he and eight women he employed as models were arrested in 2013, William James Hartwell told police and the FBI he expected the law would bust him eventually.

He probably did not expect the case to stick. On Friday, a jury convicted Hartwell, 56, of 10 charges including operating a house of prostitution, pandering and sexual assault.

From before his indictment to the day of his conviction, Hartwell maintained his company, New Media Studios, produced constitutionally protected self-expression by helping clients live out their fantasy of starring in a porn film. The company operated in a nondescript, unmarked building near Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and solicited customers and models through classified ads on websites.

“We run a safe, legal business,” he told officers at the time, apparently banking on a lack of specificity in Arizona law: Prostitution is illegal in the state, but statutes do not specifically prohibit the production of pornography.

His attorneys called the enterprise a service.

“All sexual conduct that took place at the studio was for the purpose of exploring and expressing an individual’s sexuality via safe and legal adult content creation,” they argued in court documents.

Hartwell’s employees were not as kind to him or the endeavor. Several of the women pleaded guilty to prostitution charges and agreed to testify against their former employer in exchange for reduced sentences. Two of the women were the source of the sexual assault charges, claiming he attacked them when they said they didn’t want to work for him anymore. Hartwell was acquitted of one sexual assault charge.

According to court documents, prospective customers were told they should not give money to anyone but a receptionist, and only for the purposes of renting equipment and paying studio fees. Investigators said the women were told they didn’t have to worry about being charged with prostitution because they would never actually handle any money or otherwise directly take payment for sex.

And sex, the women testified, is exactly what they were there to provide. They told clients they were paid to appear in explicit photographs, but “whatever happens, happens.”

In order to back up the ruse, the women insisted clients shoot a brief video or take 10 photographs before getting down to business.

The studio reportedly raked in $40,000 monthly.

 

About the Author
A red-headed Texan with the temperament to match, Sue Denim is an award-winning journalist and all-around troublemaker.
  • google-share
Previous Story

Just a Hunch: Rise in ‘Porn Investigations’ is Coming

Next Story

Not Every Easter Egg Hunt Offers a $1,000 Grand Prize

Related Posts

Flag of Arizona

AZ Legislature Officially Declares Porn a Very Bad Thing

Posted On 08 May 2019
, By Ben Suroeste

Arizona ‘Porn Studio’ Owner Gets 24-year Prison Term

Posted On 28 Aug 2017
, By Sue Denim

They Just Don’t Make Clever Disguises Like They Used To

Posted On 11 Apr 2017
, By GeneZorkin

One Comment

  1. S3X_jay April 11, 2017 at 9:40 am Log in to Reply

    Curious how a camera can make it not prostitution in some cases but not others. I’ve always thought shooting “private videos” would be a good way to make it not prostitution. Guess this case shows there are limits to that.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • TrafficStars
    Marketing & Traffic Services
  • CamsPower
    Live Cam Affiliate Programs
  • Adult Sexperteaze
    Web Design & Templates
  • Premiere Listing

    The European Summit

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Cubbi Thompson Inspires Perspiration in Reality Kings Scene

Posted On 22 Aug 2025

Will Notorious or Fresh Be Victorious at Evolved Fights?

Posted On 22 Aug 2025

Kyaa Chimera Craves the Big One in Latest from She Loves Black

Posted On 22 Aug 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Someone puts Gal Gadot in one of your vids? Take it down!

Posted On 13 Dec 2017

Hoping viewers can also enjoy a spooky...

Posted On 24 Oct 2023

now a days these type of games will get...

Posted On 17 Jul 2023

good move from adent. these type of...

Posted On 06 Jul 2023

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy