YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

Justice Clarence Thomas Takes Aim At Section 230 Again

Posted On 07 Apr 2021
By : Michael McGrady

Supreme Court Justice Clarence ThomasWASHINGTON — Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas of the United States Supreme Court keeps pushing for Section 230 reform and to crack down on large technology companies.

The high court this week dismissed as moot a lower court ruling that former Republican President Donald Trump violated the First Amendment rights of his critics who he’d blocked on Twitter.

The Second Circuit Appeals Court had ruled in Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump that the controversial president was violating standing Freedom of Information laws and the First Amendment because of the declaration that the president used his personal Twitter account as an official medium. The high court found the case to be moot since Trump is no longer president and has been banned permanently from the platform.

Despite the context of the ruling (or lack thereof), Justice Thomas took the time to issue a concurring opinion that explicitly took broad aim at Twitter, social media networks in general, and (of course) Section 230.

NPR reports that Thomas found Trump’s ban from Twitter exposed “potential abuses” of “applying old doctrines to new digital platforms,” and that this practice is “rarely straightforward.”

“As Twitter made clear, the right to cut off speech lies most powerfully in the hands of private digital platforms,” Thomas wrote. “The extent to which that power matters for purposes of the First Amendment and the extent to which that power could lawfully be modified raise interesting and important questions.”

Thomas adds: “It changes nothing that these platforms are not the sole means for distributing speech or information. A person always could choose to avoid the toll bridge or train and instead swim the Charles River or hike the Oregon Trail. But in assessing whether a company exercises substantial market power, what matters is whether the alternatives are comparable. For many of today’s digital platforms, nothing is.”

Thomas essentially calls for social media companies to be regulated like a public utility, like a telephone company, or something “regulated in this manner.”

This isn’t the first time Thomas has gotten weird with his opinions on social media and technology regulation. He issued a similar opinion asking his Supreme Court colleagues to review the constitutionality of Section 230 in a concurring opinion after the Supreme Court declined to hear Malwarebytes Inc. v. Enigma Software Group USA LLC.
“Courts have long emphasized non-textual arguments when interpreting §230, leaving questionable precedent in their wake. Extending §230 immunity beyond the natural reading of the text can have serious consequences,” Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion in Malwarebytes.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed an amicus brief in Malwarebytes urging the court to take up the case due to the implications related to Section 230.

It should be noted that the opinions of Thomas are not those of the entire high tribunal. Of course, many of the sitting justices haven’t issued overtly partisan opinions on the status of Section 230. The sentiments from Thomas could harm the sanctity of First Amendment rights on the internet that is categorically protected by Section 230, per federal law.

Section 230, under the benchmark Supreme Court case Reno v. ACLU, also assures that internet speech is, almost in its entirety, protected by the First Amendment. The keystone to this, however, is the liability shield built into Section 230 that supports the right of an interactive computer service to conduct self-regulation and content moderation actions.

Porn websites especially rely on Section 230 safe harbor to monitor their content and assure compliance standards and industry-endorsed child protection measures. Given the ongoing anti-porn sentiment driving scrutiny of the online adult industry, moves to repeal or completely gut Section 230’s current form would directly threaten internet porn, which is protected by the First Amendment.

At the end of the day, Thomas is on the wrong side of the argument.

 

Clarence Thomas official portrait by Steve Petteway, from the Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

About the Author
Michael McGrady is an adult entertainment industry journalist based in the United States. He is also a public relations professional and owns My Adult SEO — a brand new digital marketing agency. Michael is also a published adult photographer. He is a contributor to YNOT.com, YNOT Cam, YNOT Magazine, and a contributing editor of ASN Lifestyle Magazine. Michael is married and lives in Colorado.
  • google-share
Previous Story

YNOT Group Among ASACP’s Featured Sponsors in April

Next Story

PASS: COVID-19 Testing Currently Still Required for Vaccinated Performers

Related Posts

Free Speech Coalition

FSC Decries Supreme Court’s “Radical Departure from Precedent”

Posted On 30 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin
Justices of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Texas Age-Verification Law

Posted On 27 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin
FSC v. Paxton: Will the Supreme Court Rule in Favor of Texas?

FSC v. Paxton: Will the Supreme Court Rule in Favor of Texas?

Posted On 26 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • Gaelic WWW Conference
    News & Resources
  • Buy My Kiss
    Webcam Studios
  • JM Digital Marketing
    Marketing Consultants
  • Premiere Listing

    YNOT Mail

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Free Speech Coalition

FSC Decries Supreme Court’s “Radical Departure from Precedent”

Posted On 30 Jun 2025

Beth McKenna has "A Very Productive Meeting" with Leilani Lei & Savvy G

Posted On 30 Jun 2025

Ricky’s Room Drops Kinky New Liz Jordan Scened

Posted On 30 Jun 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Sex Toy Collective Dildo Sculptor

Posted On 19 Mar 2019

Find a good sex toy is now a problem,...

Posted On 18 Mar 2024

Thanks to the variety of sex toys, I can...

Posted On 02 Feb 2024

I understand the concerns about...

Posted On 05 Jan 2024

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy