As artificial intelligence technologies advance, hostility towards their development and application is growing in some circles. AP News is reporting that this backlash is particularly evident in online communities where users feel their contributions are being exploited to train AI systems without proper consent or compensation.

Prominent platforms such as Reddit, Stack Overflow, and Wikipedia rely heavily on user-generated content, which is increasingly being used to develop AI models. This practice has sparked significant discontent among long-time contributors, who find their genuine interactions overshadowed by AI-generated commentary.

“There’s a feeling of helplessness among many users,” said Sarah Gilbert, a volunteer moderator on Reddit and researcher at Cornell University. “They see their valuable contributions being co-opted without their permission, and it leaves them considering extreme measures like going offline or distorting their past contributions.”

This sentiment is echoed on Stack Overflow, a major resource for computer programmers. Initially, the platform banned AI-generated responses due to accuracy concerns. However, it later partnered with AI developers, causing friction with its user base. Some users attempted to delete their contributions in protest, only to face account suspensions due to the platform’s content policies.

Andy Rotering, a software developer from Bloomington, Minnesota, voiced his concerns about the platform’s direction. “Stack Overflow risks alienating its most valuable asset—the community of knowledgeable contributors,” he said. “Incentivizing these contributors should be a top priority.”

The platform’s CEO, Prashanth Chandrasekar, acknowledges the challenge of balancing the growing demand for AI-generated assistance with maintaining a thriving user-driven knowledge base. “We’re navigating a complex landscape where authentic human contributions are becoming scarce,” he said.

Governments are also stepping in to address these concerns. Brazil’s privacy regulator recently banned Meta Platforms from using Brazilian users’ Facebook and Instagram posts to train its AI models, imposing daily fines for non-compliance. Meta criticized the decision as a setback for innovation, despite similar practices by other companies.

In Europe, Meta has paused its plans to use public posts for AI training due to regulatory pushback. In contrast, the U.S. lacks comprehensive privacy laws, making such practices more commonplace.

Reddit has struck deals with AI developers while emphasizing user rights and privacy. These agreements have provided the financial boost needed for the company’s successful IPO. However, the influx of AI-generated content presents challenges for moderators like Gilbert, who fear it could erode the platform’s human-centric appeal.

“People come to Reddit to engage with other people, not bots,” Gilbert said. “There’s a risk that AI-generated content, which ironically stems from human comments, could eventually drive users away.”

As the use of AI continues to expand, the growing hostility highlights the need for platforms and policymakers to address these concerns. Ensuring that user contributions are respected and valued remains critical in maintaining the integrity and trust of online communities.