YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

WIPO: Free Speech Rights Protect Political Parody

Posted On 30 Jul 2009
By : admin

GENEVA, SWITZERLAND — A parody website has been allowed to retain its domain name even though the URL differs from the target of its lampooning only in the extension after the “dot.”The World Intellectual Property Organization allowed the owners of SutherlandInstitute.com to retain their domain name because the website clearly identifies itself as satire and does not attempt commercial exploitation of the Sutherland Institute’s service mark or domain name, SutherlandInstitute.org. The conservative think tank had demanded possession of SutherlandInstitute.com based on a “bad faith” use of the offending URL.

In rendering its decision, WIPO — an international organization authorized to arbitrate and if necessary adjudicate disputes between domain owners — noted that since both domain owners are based in the U.S. and the upstart protest domain did not exemplify a “use in bad faith,” the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment guarantees of free speech trumped any interest Sutherland Institute might have in silencing critics.

“Because this proceeding involves political speech that is strongly protected under the U.S. Constitution, the [WIPO] panel will not in these proceedings involving two U.S. parties attempt to identify bad-faith elements that are not specifically enumerated in the [Domain Name Dispute Resolution] Policy,” the WIPO ruling noted. “If the right of political speech is to be interfered with based upon [the institute’s] service mark incorporated in [the parody site’s] disputed domain name, it is preferable that a federal or state court make that application of the concept of ‘bad faith.’”

WIPO’s dispute resolution policy allows the transfer of domain names in cases where URLs are “confusingly similar” to trade or service marks; the owner of the offending URL has no legitimate interest in the name, and the disputed URL clearly is used in a bad-faith effort to subvert the rights of the mark’s owner. The WIPO panel ruled the Sutherland Institute demonstrated the first two conditions but failed to meet the third because there was no commercial exploitation in evidence.

“Here [the site owner] is in this panel’s view using the disputed domain name for purposes of constitutionally protected political speech,” the ruling noted. “In this context, the panel is reluctant to use a basis for a finding of bad faith other than those expressly enumerated in the policy. Those expressly enumerated criteria of bad faith reflect the policy’s principal concern with conduct that takes unfair advantage of trademark owners for purposes of commercial advantage.

“[Sutherland Institute] has principally argued that [the owners of the disputed URL] registered the disputed domain name for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor,” the ruling continued. “Yet only by the exercise of mental gymnastics may a group of gay rights-activists be defined as a ‘competitor’ of a conservative public-policy think tank.

“A person seeking the services of a lobbyist or advocacy group who is unable to secure the services of a conservative think tank is unlikely to decide to take its business instead to a group of gay-rights activists. Perhaps in some very attenuated sense these two entities are ‘competitors in the marketplace for ideas,’ but the panel does not think this is what the policy means when it refers to ‘competitors.’”

In its challenge, Sutherland Institute argued donations from its benefactors were jeopardized by the protest site’s confusingly similar domain name and its diametrically opposite content. At best, that claim resided in a leaky bucket, the WIPO panel noted, saying the institute’s revenues were not adversely affected by any attempt on the part of the parody site to shanghai monies the institute might have collected.

“While [the protest site’s owner] undoubtedly registered and has used the disputed domain name to confuse internet users concerning [the institute’s goals] as a source, sponsor, affiliate or endorser of its website, there is no evidence that [the site owner has] done so for ‘commercial gain,’” the panel noted in the ruling. “The evidence before the panel indicates that [the parody site] is engaged in ‘pure political speech.’ There are no advertising links on [the disputed] website. There are no requests for financial support on [the disputed] website.”

  • google-share
Previous Story

File-Sharing Could be National Security Risk

Next Story

Police Bust Alleged Basement Strip Club

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • Kiiroo
    Novelty & Lingerie Manufacturers
  • Adultsmart
    Online Retail Stores
  • Niarossxxx – Premium Ebony Interracial Content
    Online Content Providers
  • Premiere Listing

    Adult Site Broker

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Jewell Marceau Visits Matt Slayer's 'And Now We Drink' Podcast

Posted On 08 Jul 2025

Ria Bentley and Silas Stone Deliver Scorching Hot New Scene

Posted On 08 Jul 2025

It’s The Occult vs. Taking Care of Business at Evolved Fights Lez

Posted On 08 Jul 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Sex Toy Collective Dildo Sculptor

Posted On 19 Mar 2019

Find a good sex toy is now a problem,...

Posted On 18 Mar 2024

Thanks to the variety of sex toys, I can...

Posted On 02 Feb 2024

I understand the concerns about...

Posted On 05 Jan 2024

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy