YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

UT Agency Accidentally Discloses Four Email Addresses From State’s “Child Protection Registry”

Posted On 13 Oct 2006
By : admin

SALT LAKE CITY, UT – Fulfilling the predictions of some critics of the state’s Child Protective Registry, the Utah Division of Consumer Protection accidentally disclosed the email addresses of four children from the registry.According to a report in The Salt Lake Tribune, details of the security lapse were revealed in court documents filed by the Free Speech Coalition (FSC), which is challenging the constitutionality (among other things) of the registry. The Tribune also reports that Francine Giani, Director of the Utah Department of Commerce later confirmed the accidental disclosure.

The email addresses at issue were originally listed on citations issued to alleged violators of the state’s Child Protection Registry law and were subsequently obtained through a standard open records request.

“It appears a very new member of our staff may not have followed” open records laws, Giani told the Tribune. “We are investigating what happened, why it happened and how we can make sure it never happens again.”

“A fair amount of trust has been placed with us and this is not a good thing,” Giani added. “I’m sick about it.”

Critics of the Utah registry, and a similar registry in use in Michigan, have long maintained that such registries, well-intended though they may be, actually increase the risk of children’s email addresses being distributed and children being exposed to harmful material.

Jerome Mooney, the attorney handling the FSC’s lawsuit challenging the Utah registry law, told the Tribune the incident represented a “substantial failure” of the system.

“It’s not like anyone was probing the system to look for weaknesses,” Mooney noted. “This just underscores one of the issues the Federal Trade Commission was worried about that the benefits [of the registry] are outweighed by the risks of compromise.”

In September, after Utah officials cited four companies with violating the Child Protection Registry statute, Justin Weiss, director of legislative affairs for the E-mail Service Provider Coalition, requested copies of the citations. According to the Tribune, the state quickly complied, but failed to redact the email address of the minors whose addresses had been mailed to in alleged violation of the law.

Weiss informed Utah officials about the security lapse on October 3rd, and urged them to contact the people whose personal information had been disclosed, according to court documents obtained by the Tribune.

Two weeks prior to the breach, Matthew Prince, the president and CEO of UnSpam, the company that provides the registry service, stated that such a breach was impossible – a statement that UnSpam’s attorney says the company still stands behind.

“Even if ordered by a court or held at gunpoint, there is no feasible way that I, any Unspam employee, or any state official could provide you even a single address that has been submitted for compliance by any sender,” Prince stated in an affidavit, according to the Tribune.

Brent Hatch, an attorney representing UnSpam, told the Tribune that Prince was speaking only of email lists submitted to his company and that the state got the emails it accidentally divulged from the parents of children who complained about their children receiving allegedly illegal email solicitations.

“This has nothing to do with the registry,” Hatch claimed, adding that the registry is “completely secure.”

“The Free Speech Coalition got it flat wrong,” Hatch added. “We stand behind Mr. Prince’s statement.”

  • google-share
Previous Story

Jeffrey Douglas Comments on Meeting with FBI, Inspection of Legend Video’s 2257 Records

Next Story

IE Share of Browser Market Reportedly Lowest In Years

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • WMA
    News & Resources
  • Aplus Hosting
    Website Hosting Services
  • OC Body
    Health and Medical Services
  • Premiere Listing

    MojoHost

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Beth McKenna Announces Caught Looking Starring Leilani Lei, Savvy G, and Don Grammar

Posted On 19 May 2025

Gigi Dior Launches Limited Edition Merch Collection with InsidetheDrop

Posted On 19 May 2025

Starlet Addis Fouche Hosts The Lust Files at The Cutting Room in NYC on Tuesday, May 27

Posted On 19 May 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Sex Toy Collective Dildo Sculptor

Posted On 19 Mar 2019

Find a good sex toy is now a problem,...

Posted On 18 Mar 2024

Thanks to the variety of sex toys, I can...

Posted On 02 Feb 2024

I understand the concerns about...

Posted On 05 Jan 2024

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy