YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

N.C. Bill Would Increase Penalty for Obscenity; Are Drag Shows a Target?

Posted On 03 May 2023
By : GeneZorkin

North Carolina bill would increase penalties for obscenity offenses; are drag shows a target?RALEIGH, N.C. – Comments made last month by Wilson County Republican Sen. Buck Newton raised concerns that a bill he sponsored, S579, might be used to target drag shows performed in the state. But the text of the bill neither references drag shows, nor offers an expanded definition of “obscenity”, which likely limits its prospects as a potential drag performer-harassment mechanism.

Netwon’s bill is nothing if not brief. S579 would amend existing state code §14-190.1(g) to read that “Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a violation of this section is a Class I felony. A violation of this section committed knowingly in the presence of an individual under 18 years of age is a Class H felony.” The bill’s only other text sets its effective date to December 1, 2023.

During a committee session on the bill, Newton was asked whether the bill had anything to do with drag shows. In response, Newton said that “obscene drag shows in front of children certainly might qualify”, but allowed for the fact that other, non-obscene shows are protected under the First Amendment.

“We have a problem in our society with obscenity and pornography and lewd behavior in front of others,” Newton said in subsequent comments. “And I don’t think we should lose sight of that.”

The definition of obscenity in North Carolina law, which is found under §14-190.1(b), largely tracks the definition established by the three-prong “Miller Test”. Just as in the Miller Test, for material to be deemed obscene under North Carolina law, it must depict or describe “in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined” elsewhere in the statute; must be material that the “average person applying contemporary community standards relating to the depiction or description of sexual matters would find that the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex”; the material must lack “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value” and the material “as used” must not be “protected or privileged under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of North Carolina.”

The State’s definition of “sexual conduct” has some interesting specificities to it. It covers “(v)aginal, anal, or oral intercourse, whether actual or simulated, normal or perverted… (m)asturbation, excretory functions, or lewd exhibition of uncovered genitals… or (a)n act or condition that depicts torture, physical restraint by being fettered or bound, or flagellation of or by a nude person or a person clad in undergarments or in revealing or bizarre costume.”

§14-190.1(d) states that obscenity “shall be judged with reference to ordinary adults except that it shall be judged with reference to children or other especially susceptible audiences if it appears from the character of the material or the circumstances of its dissemination to be especially designed for or directed to such children or audiences.”

Newton’s bill doesn’t amend or expand the definition of obscenity, just changes the level of felony specified in §14-190.1(g) from a Class I to a Class H. Under North Carolina law, Class I felonies carry a sentence of 3-12 months, while those who commit Class H felonies face 4 to 25 months, each with a wide variety of potential aggravating and mitigating factors.

Sen. Lisa Grafstein, a Democrat from Wake County who unsuccessfully introduced a proposed amendment to Newton’s bill that would have exposed commercial entities to civil liability if they distribute material harmful to minors without confirming the recipient is at least 18 years of age, said that she is satisfied that S579 would neither expand the definition of obscenity, or target specific types of entertainment. She also suggested that there was a need to go further than Newton’s bill envisions.

“Certainly, ensuring that there are criminal penalties is important,” Grafstein said. “But we also have the technology to do more.”

Grafstein added that her proposed amendment would have addressed “the access to pornography and to other improper materials on the internet at the source.”

 

Photo of Raleigh, North Carolina by Curtis Adams from Pexels

About the Author
Gene Zorkin has been covering legal and political issues for various adult publications (and under a variety of different pen names) since 2002.
  • google-share
Previous Story

This Week’s Guest on Adult Site Broker Talk is Monte Cahn

Next Story

Free Speech Coalition Files Legal Challenge to Utah’s Age Verification Law

Related Posts

Free Speech Coalition

FSC Decries Supreme Court’s “Radical Departure from Precedent”

Posted On 30 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin
Justices of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Texas Age-Verification Law

Posted On 27 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin
FSC v. Paxton: Will the Supreme Court Rule in Favor of Texas?

FSC v. Paxton: Will the Supreme Court Rule in Favor of Texas?

Posted On 26 Jun 2025
, By GeneZorkin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • WMA
    News & Resources
  • Make a porn website
    Website Scripts
  • CamClone
    White Label Content
  • Premiere Listing

    Mail Value Profits

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Free Speech Coalition

FSC Decries Supreme Court’s “Radical Departure from Precedent”

Posted On 30 Jun 2025

Beth McKenna has "A Very Productive Meeting" with Leilani Lei & Savvy G

Posted On 30 Jun 2025

Ricky’s Room Drops Kinky New Liz Jordan Scened

Posted On 30 Jun 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Sex Toy Collective Dildo Sculptor

Posted On 19 Mar 2019

Find a good sex toy is now a problem,...

Posted On 18 Mar 2024

Thanks to the variety of sex toys, I can...

Posted On 02 Feb 2024

I understand the concerns about...

Posted On 05 Jan 2024

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy