YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

Given the Chance, Would the Supreme Court Redefine “Obscenity”?

Posted On 11 Jan 2023
By : GeneZorkin

Justices of the Supreme CourtWASHINGTON, D.C. – The consensus among the attorneys I’ve spoken to about Utah Senator Mike Lee’s “Interstate Obscenity Definition Act” (IODA) is that the legislation is unlikely to ever come up for a vote, let alone pass in the Democrat-controlled Senate.

For all the usual reasons that bills like IODA are rolled out with great fanfare, only to die later with nary an audible whimper, Lee’s attempt to redefine “obscenity” will probably never have an impact on the adult entertainment industry.

“As drafted, the IODA bill has no chance of passing the Senate,” said Jeffrey Douglas, Board Chair of the Free Speech Coalition, adding that obscenity prosecutions “are of interest only to campaigning Republicans.”

For the sake of argument though, let’s suppose the bill does pass; what then?

“This legislative attempt to redefine obscenity is likely to be met with a constitutional challenge since it seeks to create a new category of unprotected speech that is inconsistent with U.S. Supreme Court precedent,” attorney Larry Walters told YNOT. “The test for separating constitutionally protected erotic speech from illegal obscenity has been established since the Court’s 1973 decision in Miller v. California. The Court has not changed this test despite numerous legal challenges and opportunities to reconsider the decision in the last five decades. Congress lacks the power to create a new definition for obscenity since this is a constitutional issue, and the boundary between protected and unprotected speech has been established by the Court.”

Douglas concurred with Walters, noting that Lee’s bill is “entirely inconsistent” with the Miller Test.

“Only a super-activist Federal judge would uphold the statute,” Douglas said. “Likewise, it would be difficult to find a three-judge Court of Appeals panel to uphold a statute so inconsistent with binding precedent.”

Reed Lee, FSC’s Legal Committee Chair, agreed with Douglas and Walters that IODA is extremely unlikely to withstand court scrutiny, should it ever make it that far. In his analysis of IODA’s language, Lee observed a “rather subtle but absolutely critical” point about the bill.

“It boils down to the word ‘includes’,” Lee explained. “Every previous constitutional obscenity test sought to define the limits of what could be obscene. But not this one! ‘Includes’ defines the minimum of what is constitutionally unprotected obscenity. Who knows what else there might be?!!? Again, under the contemporary constitutional approach… the subtle abandonment of an all-embracing definition of obscenity is unquestionably fatal in the long run. The required challenge procedures may be elaborate, but an easy substantive one under existing constitutional law.”

This all sounds encouraging, from an adult industry perspective. But for many years, it was common to hear that bans on abortion should be of no concern to reproductive rights advocates, because it was so unlikely the Supreme Court would ever overturn Roe v. Wade – and then along came SCOTUS’ decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

So, extending our (admittedly unlikely) hypothetical yet further, are these same attorneys confident the Supreme Court won’t go messing with the Miller standard, if offered the invitation to do so?

“If cert were granted, I have no confidence that the current majority of the Court would not make the minimum standard for an obscenity worse than Miller,” Douglas said. “However, I do not anticipate that cert would be granted even if the bill were signed into law.”

Asked whether he was concerned about the possibility the current Supreme Court might come up with reasoning under which Lee’s bill is Constitutional, Lee responded with a definitive “Yes.”

“This may be the entire point of the bill,” Lee said. “It might be that Sen. Lee is too stupid or stubborn to recognize the foregoing constitutional problems. But it is also quite possible that he and others are hoping for a very profound change in obscenity (and other constitutional) law. He may be betting that such a change is in the offing.”

Walters said that while “it does not appear that the Court has an appetite to reexamine the obscenity test,” he added that if it turns out the court does have such an appetite, “the adult industry should brace for a potential blockbuster decision that could have far reaching consequences for free expression in the United States.”

On the other hand, any conservatives who might welcome the idea of a major shift in the contours of the First Amendment’s protections might want to think twice about the appeal of that notion.

“I saw this bill the day it was introduced and my first reaction was (and remains) that moral conservatives are trying to ‘force the spring’ on this and other profound changes in constitutional law,” Lee said. “But it will not be a slam-dunk for them. Especially after Trump started whining about getting banned from Twitter, conservatives have realized that freedom of expression cuts both ways. Some will suggest that they can have their cake and eat it too, with changes which will affect us (to put it crudely) but not them. But our job will be to show that it will not be so simple – that conservatives have much to fear from weakening the First Amendment.”

In other words, when it comes to bills like Lee’s, conservatives should be careful what they wish for, because they just might get it.

Here’s hoping that if IODA (or any similar bill) becomes law and the Supreme Court has occasion to take up the case, the Court’s conservative justices have ears to hear that warning.

About the Author
Gene Zorkin has been covering legal and political issues for various adult publications (and under a variety of different pen names) since 2002.
  • google-share
Previous Story

Top OnlyFans Star, St. James Talks Ageism on Social Media

Next Story

An Interview with Brandi Love – Secrets of Building a Successful Brand

Related Posts

Justices of the Supreme Court

The Court Gave Governments an Inch. Expect Them to Take a Mile

Posted On 24 Jul 2025
, By GeneZorkin
Good News: Now Under 30% of My Content Will Be Harmful to Minors!

Good News: Now Under 30% of My Content Will Be Harmful to Minors!

Posted On 18 Jul 2025
, By Ben Suroeste
Attorney Corey D. Silverstein's Age Verification Webinar Now Streaming

Attorney Corey D. Silverstein’s Age Verification Webinar Now Streaming

Posted On 15 Jul 2025
, By GeneZorkin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • FUBAR Webmasters
    Photographers and Videographers
  • BerlinBananas
    Distributors & Manufacturers
  • Adult Sex Toy
    Online Retail Stores
  • Premiere Listing

    YNOT Mail

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Victoria Malfoy and Autumn Orchid In Sensual Girl-Girl Scene in ManyVids Release

Posted On 03 Sep 2025

RedGIFs Announces BullBossJosh as September Creator of the Month

Posted On 03 Sep 2025

Andie Anderson Stars in POV Scene from MILF VR

Posted On 03 Sep 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Someone puts Gal Gadot in one of your vids? Take it down!

Posted On 13 Dec 2017

Hoping viewers can also enjoy a spooky...

Posted On 24 Oct 2023

now a days these type of games will get...

Posted On 17 Jul 2023

good move from adent. these type of...

Posted On 06 Jul 2023

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy