YNOT
  • Home
  • Industry News
    • Adult Business News
    • Adult Novelty News
    • YNOT Magazine
    • EU News
    • Opinions
    • Picture Galleries
  • PR Wire
    • Adult Company News
    • Adult Retail News
    • Adult Talent News
    • Adult Videos News
  • Podcasts
  • Industry Guides
    • Adult Affiliate Guide
    • Affiliate Marketing for Beginners
    • Top Adult Traffic Networks
    • Top Adult PR Agents
    • Funding an Adult Business
  • Business Directory
    • View Categories
    • View Listings
    • Submit Listing
  • Newsletters
  • Industry Events
    • Events Calendar
    • YNOT Cam Awards | Hollywood
    • YNOT Awards | Prague
    • YNOT Cammunity
    • YNOT Summit
    • YNOT Reunion
  • Login with YNOT ID

Bill AB 5: Adult Performers Not Among Professionals Exempted from “ABC Test”

Posted On 07 Jun 2019
By : GeneZorkin

California State AssemblySACRAMENTO, Calif. – Last year, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles which upheld a lower court’s “ABC Test” that determines whether a worker is an “independent contractor” or an “employee.”

Following the decision, the California legislature got to work codifying the court’s decision into statutory law – and establishing exemptions to it that the legislature deemed necessary for certain types of businesses.

Last week, the California Assembly passed bill AB 5, which adopts the court’s reasoning in the Dynamex case, which essentially holds that all workers are employees by default and should only qualify as independent contractors if the conditions of the ABC Test are met.

In its ruling, the California Supreme Court held that under the ABC Test, “a worker is properly considered an independent contractor to whom a wage order does not apply only if the hiring entity establishes: (A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact; (B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity.”

By its plain text, the ABC Test appears to cover a wide variety of businesses in which workers have long been considered independent contractors, but many of whose workers would likely ‘fail’ the test – including adult performers, who generally have not been considered “employees” of the studios who produce the works in which they appear.

In addition to codifying in statutory law the ABC Test, AB 5 serves to exempt a list of business types from the test.

“The bill would exempt specified professions from these provisions and instead provide that the employment relationship test for those professions shall be governed by the test adopted in S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations if certain requirements are met,” states the Legislative Counsel’s Digest for AB 5. “These exempt professions would include licensed insurance agents, certain licensed health care professionals, registered securities broker-dealers or investment advisers, a direct sales salesperson, real estate licensees, workers providing hairstyling or barbering services, and those performing work under a contract for professional services.”

In a statement issued after the Assembly’s vote last week, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego), the bill’s author, called AB 5 “an important work-in-progress to provide certainty to California’s businesses.”

Adult studios are among those awaiting such certainty – but they may well be disappointed when the bill’s text is finalized. In a recent post on the Ogletree Deakins website, attorney Karen Tynan noted that “trade organizations and professional groups continue to lobby in Sacramento to join the list of exemptions to the ABC test, but it is unclear which categories of workers might be added to the growing list of professionals.”

If adult performers are not listed among the professionals exempt from the ABC Test, the plain text of the test strongly suggests performers would be considered employees rather than independent contractors. Among other things, a performer who is hired by an adult studio or producer to appear in an adult movie seems very unlikely to be deemed to be doing something “outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.”

While it might be comforting to assume this challenge is one which can be dealt with careful drafting of contracts, there have been cases in other states where the courts made it clear that when it comes to the question of whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor, the law prevails over the terms of a contract.

In other words, unless AB 5 is amended to add adult performers to the list of exempted professionals, adult studios may find themselves literally following the advice of a recent tweet from Tynan: “Read it and weep.”

Here’s the Independent Contractor bill text for those interested in the details. Read it and weep ….. ? Bill Text – AB-5 Worker status: employees and independent contractors. https://t.co/xWtfc1erTH

— Karen Tynan (@KarenAttorney) June 4, 2019

About the Author
Gene Zorkin has been covering legal and political issues for various adult publications (and under a variety of different pen names) since 2002.
  • google-share
Previous Story

Cam Starlet, ’70s TV Icon Subject of Barcroft Series, ‘Love Don’t Judge’

Next Story

Chaturbate On Board as Presenting Sponsor of #Cammunity Cam Model Summit

Related Posts

Adult Performers Seek to Withdraw Meta Lawsuit; Meta Wants Summary Judgment

Class Action Lawsuit Highlights Risks of Employee Misclassification

Posted On 17 Nov 2023
, By GeneZorkin
If your law requires a million exemptions, maybe it's not a good law

If Your Law Needs Scores of Exemptions, Maybe Rethink the Law?

Posted On 21 Mar 2023
, By GeneZorkin
Property value panacea - make porn shops move further away

Want to Save Your Community? Make Porn Shops Move Further Away!

Posted On 27 Jul 2022
, By Ben Suroeste

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor

YNOT Shoot Me

YNOTShootMe.com has exclusive pics from adult industry business events. Check it out!

YNOT Directory

  • BongaCash
    Live Cam Affiliate Programs
  • Lovers Choice
    Novelty & Lingerie Distributors
  • Cams Rated
    Live Cam Networks
  • Premiere Listing

    iWantClips

    More Details

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Coco Bae Takes Her 1st Ride in the Fake Taxi

Posted On 16 Jun 2025
Corey D. Silverstein to Host Webinar on SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling

Corey D. Silverstein to Host Webinar on SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling

Posted On 16 Jun 2025

Texas Patti Talks about Porn in U.S. vs. Germany on Holly Randall Unfiltered

Posted On 16 Jun 2025

Vanessa, Meet Vivid

Posted On 29 Sep 2014
Laila Mickelwaite and Exodus Cry

Laila Mickelwaite, Exodus Cry and their Crusade Against Porn

Posted On 03 May 2021

Sex Toy Collective Dildo Sculptor

Posted On 19 Mar 2019

Find a good sex toy is now a problem,...

Posted On 18 Mar 2024

Thanks to the variety of sex toys, I can...

Posted On 02 Feb 2024

I understand the concerns about...

Posted On 05 Jan 2024

Sponsor

Sitemap
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy Policy